Hi all, firstly I want to Thank David for taking a really good look at these smurfs as we really do know very little about them generally.
I have always had the impression that most, if not all of these kicker smurfs are unlicensed and I had also heard the story about the license not being granted and the old stock being bought up a few years ago. Off the top of my head I am fairly sure there were even fewer of these in the earlier DSKs and I will try and check this later.
It certainly makes sense what has been said about the "two sets" and the painted and unpainted shoes possibly being made up to give the impression of two sets. As mentioned, most of mine are shiny although apart from one or two, the painting on them does seem to be pretty good although maybe I just got lucky but I do have a couple that have black paint marks on them which would again support the theory about the shoes being painted at a later date and being stored poorly whilst the paint was still wet.
Something else I noticed about these was that when they first started appearing about 3 or 4 years ago, all were painted in their strip colours but then a huge about of complete blanks hit the market, begging I suppose to be painted up.
Stace, yours looks like the writing has been hand painted on whereas mine all look like the writing was printed or stamped on. Could we now be looking at the blank raw ones that have been painted recently???
Great discussion to follow as I am learning more about the kickers so when I eventually get around to adding them to Blue Imps I will be able to give some real info with them.